Normally the same Examiners assess the re-submitted thesis. Each Examiner must independently and without consultation, decide whether the thesis meets the scholarly standards for the discipline and degree. Step 6 – Submit Once your information is complete and your thesis is ready select ‘submit’ to submit your information and document into the Scholarship Western repository. When the thesis is thought to meet recognized scholarly standards for the discipline and degree and is ready for examination, the Graduate Chair arranges a Thesis Examination by setting a proposed date and obtaining provisional consent from the potential members of the Thesis Examination Board. Normally the entire process, from the Graduate Chair’s request for a Thesis Examination to the placement of the candidate’s name on the convocation list, requires approximately five weeks. If there is not a majority of Examiners who judge the written thesis to be acceptable, the Program cancels the Thesis Examination, and the Graduate Chair of the Program concerned [Modified Sept. To fulfill the degree requirement, the thesis and the candidate’s oral examination must be assessed and approved by a Thesis Examination Board and meet SGPS requirements for thesis content.
Once a student has uploaded the final version of their thesis they will connect with these members to inform them that the changes await their review and approval. Unacceptable to go forward to defense Unacceptable: If there is not a majority of Examiners who judge the written thesis to be acceptable, SGPS cancels the Thesis Examination, and the Vice-Provost Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies appoints a Re-Submission Hearing Committee which reviews the case and decides whether or not to allow the candidate to prepare a revised version of the thesis for examination and, if so, the time limit for doing so. For details on how to include published material, see the Integrated Article guidelines below. By filling out these fields in the form, you are creating a metadata record for your thesis. This process is available as part of the Scholarship Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation submission process.
If there is not a majority of Examiners who judge the written thesis to be acceptable, SGPS cancels the Thesis Examination, and the Vice-Provost Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies appoints a Re-Submission Hearing Committee which reviews the case and decides whether or not thesi allow the candidate to prepare a revised version of the thesis for examination and, if so, the time limit for doing so.
Consistency in style and formatting of a thesis is essential. During the thesis exam, the Chair of the examination is responsible for assuring the following requirements and procedures are satisfied: In the case that no revisions are required, the Chair, the Examiners, and the Supervisor s sign the Certificate of Examination.
For each student writing a thesis, programs are required to establish a formal Thesis Supervisory Committee for all thesis-based Masters and PhD students consisting of a supervisor and at least one other person. To open proceedings, the Chair introduces all present.
These acceptable types are:. A formal invitation to examine the thesis and the candidate. These acceptable types are: The Vita is the last page s of the thesis. All examiner participation assumes in-person attendance unless a request for remote examination is made.
Step 6 – Submit Once your information is complete and your thesis is ready select ‘submit’ to submit your information and document into the Scholarship Western repository.
If a majority of the Examiners find that each of the thesis content and the oral defense are thesks, the candidate passes the Thesis Examination. The work must comprise a coherent account of a unified research project rather than a collection of loosely connected studies.
The body of the thesis, starting with the first page of the Introduction or Chapter One as page 1, must be numbered with Arabic numerals 1, 2, 3 placed in the upper right-hand corner, not less than A faculty member asked to examine a thesis should declare possible sources of conflict.
A spouse or partner A close family member A business partner Having previous, current, or future negotiations relating to employment This list, while not exhaustive, illustrates the nature of potential conflicts to be avoided. When you are ready to submit your decision, select “Submit review ” Follow the directions provided under “Approval to Proceed to Publication”.
At the end of the Abstract should appear a list of keywords. This ensures adequate time for: Given the research and education mandate of Canada’s publicly funded universities, it is expected that the results of this research will be made publicly available. An estimate of the percentage of the work conducted solely by the student must be included. You will receive an e-mail from the repository confirming receipt of your work.
The candidate must ensure that the abstract refers to all the elements that would make the thesis worth consulting. Normally the entire process, ueo the Graduate Chair’s request for a Thesis Guideline to the placement of the candidate’s name on the convocation list, requires approximately five weeks. For example, the following keywords could be used for a thesis studying fuzzy relational modeling: The thesis must be submitted in.
Programs may have regulations that limit length. Doctoral candidates must submit the thesis six weeks before the approved date for the Thesis Examination.
The more thorough you are, the more ‘findable’ your submission will be, so please take the time to fill in as many fields as you can about each item. Leave a margin of at least 25 mm 1 inch from the top, bottom and right edges. Graduate programs may elect the option of remote examination when one examiner is not present in person upon approval of the candidate, remote participant and graduate chair.
Tools sgpd creating styles, footnotes, a table of contents, and other features, including the recommended order of the sections of a thesis, have been formatted into an SGPS thesis template available in WORD and LaTeX formats. The Chair advises the Examiners that their evaluations on the acceptability of the thesis content should be made independent of the assessment made in Stage One: The Examiners’ approval may be conditional on the candidate successfully completing revisions to the thesis content.
A thesis consisting solely of published articles without these elements is not acceptable.