Overall, the argument Ravisankar makes is effective because it appeals to the emotions. In his essay, Ravisankar addresses the main argument against his thesis, the idea that those who oppose sweatshops actually have a negative impact on the plight of the poor in the developing world. Email required Address never made public. He refutes this argument by saying fundamentalists have argued that opposing sweatshops has a negative impact on the poor in the developing world; by opposing sweatshops, the companies move out of that area causing the poor to lose their jobs. He brings up the organization University Students against Sweatshops and how they seek to help this issue by using factories that respect workers and allow for unions. Notify me of new comments via email. He assumes that the reader knows what the term sweatshop means, but does not fully comprehend about the condition of sweatshops are like, hours spent working in these conditions, and the hourly wages.
Ravisankar begins his essay by appealing to his audience of college students. View all posts by meganodessacrosby. This factory produced garments for the dutch company Hans Textiel. His purpose in this essay is to draw awareness to the on going problem of sweatshops, where employees work 80 hours a week in horrible conditions for pennies a day. His purpose in this essay is to bring attention to the conditions of these workplaces.
A Rhetorical Analysis of Sweatshop Oppression
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. View all posts by meganodessacrosby.
He did not give a way to improve the way of life of the people in sweatshops. Email required Address never made public.
In order to accomplish this purpose, he appeals mainly to people who are already in opposition to corporate greed and sweatshops. He also appeals to the logo by explaining what drives the use of sweatshops. The problem he identifies is sweatshops treating workers inhumanely with longer working hours, less pay and gross working conditions. His purpose in this essay is to draw awareness to the on going problem of sweatshops, where employees work 80 hours a week in sweatsgop conditions for pennies a day.
Rhetorical Analysis of “Sweatshop Oppression” byRajeev Ravisankar – Site Title
Overall, the argument Ravisankar makes is effective because it employs us to look at both sides of the equation to understand why there are sweatshops and what has to be done opprdssion help dismantle them. Finally, he concludes by making the point that many organizations are currently fighting against practices like this, reassuring the readers that our impact can be felt by assisting and spreading awareness of these organizations.
Overall, the argument Ravisankar makes is effective because he presents several legitimate reasons as to why sweatshop conditions are bad for our society, and then he follows by presenting the other side and explaining why that argument contains fallacy. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. He also appeals to the companies to change.
A Rhetorical Analysis of Sweatshop Oppression | Composition2BlogSpot
Ravisankar begins his essay by trying to relate to college students on the merit of low income and detailing a small piece of American consumerism. It is actually the companies choosing to go to locations where they can find cheaper labor and weaker labor restrictions.
He refutes his argument by saying companies are the ones to blame, not the sweatshop opposers. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here By doing this we are at the very least not making the problem worse.
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
Skip to content January 27, Garment factory in Dhaka Bangladesh in the Mohakhali area. In order to accomplish this purpose, he appeals mainly to the consumers of the products produced in these conditions. You are commenting using your Twitter account. A Text and Anthology 3rd Ed. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: The problem he identifies is the poor working conditions in sweatshops. By continuing to use this website, you agree oppressioj their use.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. Email required Address never made public.
The problem his addresses is the high human cost it takes to achieve lower and lower prices.